Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers

From: proff () suburbia apana org au (Julian Assange)
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 1995 21:43:15 +1100 (EST)

Subject: Re: snooper watchers
Author:  Karl Strickland <karl () bagpuss demon co uk> at Internet
Date:    2/28/95 10:50 PM

     
whats this mean
     
is someone saying rm'ing /dev/nit and hacking mknod out of the kernel is better 
than just taking nit out of the kernel?


Can we cut this noise out and can people stop CC:ing me every damn message they 
write on the topic? This is a MAILing list, not a bloody newsgroup, I have no
need for two copies of any message, let alone these ones.

-Proff

Current thread:

Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers fast forward futurama (Mar 01)
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers System Administrator (Mar 02)
- Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Larry Glaze (Mar 02)
  - Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Christian A. Ratliff (Mar 03)
    - Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Larry Glaze (Mar 03)
    - Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
    - Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
    - Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Software Test Account (Mar 07)
    - Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Steve Robbins (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers F. L. Charles Seeger III (Mar 01)
- Re: snooper watchers der Mouse (Mar 01)

(Thread continues...)