Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: set group id on directories
From: blymn () awadi com AU (Brett Lymn)
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 14:03:17 +1030 (CST)
According to Marc Samama:
I'd like to know if a sgid bit on a directory represents a security risk, given the fact that the directory is not world or group writable.
It's not much use if the directory is not group at least g-rx.
On my system, whereas the manual states that this bit is ignored on directories, a file created on such a directory is owned by the same group that posses the dir, and any child directory has the same sgid bit, by default.
This is normal behaviour on the Suns (and I think it's documented somewhere)
It this feature commonly used anyway?
It's handy if you have a directory shared by a group of people -
combined with the right umask it makes to permissions on the files
automatic.
--
Brett Lymn, Computer Systems Administrator, AWA Defence Industries
===============================================================================
"Also, it takes a lot longer to get up North ..... The slow way"
- "Clever Trevor" Ian Drury
Current thread:
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers fast forward futurama (Mar 01)
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers System Administrator (Mar 02)
- Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Larry Glaze (Mar 02)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Christian A. Ratliff (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Larry Glaze (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Dave Schweisguth (Mar 03)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Software Test Account (Mar 07)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Steve Robbins (Mar 10)
- Re: Large security hole in SGI IRIX 5.2 Christian A. Ratliff (Mar 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re[2]: snooper watchers F. L. Charles Seeger III (Mar 01)
- Re: snooper watchers der Mouse (Mar 01)
