Bugtraq mailing list archives
R. Thomas's NFS question
From: PETER.T.WHITING () sprint sprint com (PETER.T.WHITING () sprint sprint com)
Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 09:13:22 -0400
R. Thomas> hostA --> exports /usr/share to -access=hostB
R. Thomas> hostB --> a linux box. re-exports /usr/share to everyone
R. Thamas> hostC --> not implicitly trusted by hostA, mounts /usr/share
R. Thomas> aside from any security concerns, this would certainly
R. Thomas> thrash your nfsd's. does anyone have any experience
R. Thomas> with this? i have only recently discovered this, and
R. Thomas> have not had time to peruse it in depth.
Not a problem. Host C gets to look at ***HostB's*** /usr/share - the
one that has HostA's /usr/share mounted over it, not HostA's
/usr/share. NFS gives you a single hop. In the above example HostA
could then mount (if perms were granted) HostC's /usr/share and
everything would work.
pete
Peter T. Whiting
12502 Sunrise V Dr
Reston VA, 22096
Phone (703) 689-7963
Fax (703) 689-7506
Email: Peter.T.Whiting () sprint sprint com
Current thread:
- Re: impossible vs. impractical, (continued)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Mike O'Connor (May 10)
- password backdoors System Admin (May 10)
- Error in the Lorenz-Fitzgerald assumption. A. Padgett Peterson, P.E. Information Security (May 10)
- Re: password backdoors Nathan Lawson (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Perry E. Metzger (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 08)
- and now, back to your regularly scheduled discussion topic... robert owen thomas (May 08)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Aleph One (May 08)
- R. Thomas's NFS question PETER.T.WHITING () sprint sprint com (May 09)
- Re: R. Thomas's NFS question Marek Michalkiewicz (May 10)
- RE: Anon site needed for FIP[S] PUB 190 Lawrence E. Bassham (May 09)
- unsubscribe bugtraq parkerm@cs49.holloman ParkerM,TSgt,49CS/SCSC (May 09)
- Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) G.J.W. Hagenaars (May 08)
- Re: Please, please, _please_ (was Re: impossible vs. impractical) ATM_Feel_the_Power (May 09)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical John F. Haugh II (May 10)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Tom Ptacek (May 14)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical jon (May 14)
- Re: impossible vs. impractical Tom Ptacek (May 14)
