Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions
From: alan () cableol net (Alan Cox)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 10:08:35 +0100
I think you are confusing 5.2.18 and 5.3.12. Here's the rundown:
- 5.2.18 is an older, but still widely used, libc.
- 5.3.12 is the latest release (i.e. "stable") libc.
- 5.4.4 is the latest beta/development libc.
Any solutions to the libc problem would definitely be appreciated :-)
There are a pile more in 5.2.18. I've just posted a list to linux-gcc. Worse still some of the overruns I found are environment variable based, and in BSD code from 1983, and resolv+ both widely used pieces. Alan
Current thread:
- Re: IRIX 5.3 chost, (continued)
- Re: IRIX 5.3 chost Mike Kienenberger (Aug 12)
- mail storm Dan Stromberg (Aug 12)
- Re: mail storm Dan Stromberg (Aug 12)
- Re: mail storm Arik Baratz (Aug 13)
- Re: mail storm Albert Lunde (Aug 12)
- Re: mail storm Igor Chudov @ home (Aug 12)
- Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions bloodmask (Aug 12)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Steve Czetty (Aug 13)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Alan Brown (Aug 13)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Elliot Lee (Aug 13)
- Re: Vulnrability in all known Linux distributions Alan Cox (Aug 14)
- mount/umount realpath() buffer overflow David J. Meltzer (Aug 13)
- Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload bloodmask (Aug 12)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Digital Dreamer (Aug 12)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Casper Dik (Aug 13)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Mike Acar (Aug 13)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Elliot Lee (Aug 13)
- why suid mount (was Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, Bryan Reece (Aug 13)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Christopher Masto (Aug 14)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload Brian Tao (Aug 15)
- Re: Possible bufferoverflow condition in lpr, xterm and xload *Unknown* (Aug 17)
