Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention?
From: tqbf () ENTERACT COM (Thomas H. Ptacek)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 07:03:02 -0500
Not surprisingly, as a next-gen language, Perl already had this stuff built in. Arrays and other data structures are dynamically scalable. And the "taint" dataflow checking (nothing *from* the outside world
There are fifty-five thousand lines of C code involved in the Perl interpreter. Any privileged Perl program is executing the entirety of the Perl interpreter as privileged code. I understand an appreciate Perl's attention to security with "taint" checking and scaleable datatypes, but I wouldn't trust a Perl program with an SUID bit for a heartbeat. ---------------- Thomas Ptacek at EnterAct, L.L.C., Chicago, IL [tqbf () enteract com] ---------------- "If you're so special, why aren't you dead?"
Current thread:
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention?, (continued)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Joe Zbiciak (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Daniel Ryde (Apr 28)
- xlock clarification.... David Hedley (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Steve Coleman - SEWP (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Alexander Snarskii (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Michael Shields (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Theo de Raadt (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Shawn Instenes (Apr 29)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? J.R.Valverde (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Randal Schwartz (Apr 28)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? Thomas H. Ptacek (Apr 29)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? J.R.Valverde (Apr 29)
- Re: Smashing the Stack: prevention? J.R.Valverde (Apr 29)
