Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug
From: alan () LXORGUK UKUU ORG UK (Alan Cox)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 1997 23:46:32 +0000
Ran it on my P166, kaboom, ran it on my new P166MMX, kaboom. I guess that would be a yes. This is kind of scary, is there any possibility of a kernel patch that can take care of this?
Not realistically. Intel also of course don't warrant your processor is fault free either. Perhaps the best bet right now is if you are lucky enough to have a machine that is under guarantee is to return it and provide all the mailing list documentation, and news stuff when it hits the news and ask for a K6 based box right now. Intel at least don't warrant the chip is perfect. As a reminder - most 386's crash if fed [size prefix][popad] - there was a big hoohah then everyone carried on running 386's for unix boxes and stuff and generally its not a problem. [Yeah who knows what bugs the newest K6 might have ;)] Alan
Current thread:
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug, (continued)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug George Imburgia (Nov 07)
- Re: Intel Pentium Bug Travis Hassloch (Nov 11)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Alan Cox (Nov 08)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Roger Espel Llima (Nov 09)
- solaris (fwd) Rob Hagopian (Nov 09)
- Re: solaris (fwd) Corey Lindsly (Nov 09)
- Re: solaris (fwd) James Lockwood (Nov 09)
- Re: solaris (fwd) Dalvenjah FoxFire (Nov 09)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Kurt Seifried (Nov 07)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Tim Newsham (Nov 07)
- Re: WARNING: Linux Intel Pentium Bug Alan Cox (Nov 08)
- Outdated DNS and syslog Aaron Schultz (Nov 07)
