Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: ps(1) for freebsd.
From: scotts () cybersource com (Scott Smith)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 18:35:50 -0700
Paranoia is not synonymous with security, nor is it synonymous
with "privacy."
Hacking ps to fix a security problem in ppp is not the solution:
fixing ppp is. ps(1)'s -a and -e flags were implemented for a
reason; to remove them is de-evolutionary.
Agreed, but one could associate the ability as an unprivledged user to
read *other* users' environment variables with the finger(1) bug that allowed
users to read arbitraty files (or the sendmail uuencode bug, or ...). The only
difference is that the target is not a file, it is an environment variable.
There is a reason I make my shell's rc files mode 0700 and have a umask
of 077, and paranoia/security laziness are *not* why. :)
Scott
--
scott () cybersource com
UNIX Sysadmin, CyberSource (ext. 6093)
"My manager, after having poked his head into my area for the 10th time today,
said, `I just can never understand how sysadmins can work effectively with
people breathing down their necks.'" - a friend
Current thread:
- ps(1) for freebsd. Ben (Aug 12)
- Re: ps(1) for freebsd. JDC (Aug 13)
- Re: ps(1) for freebsd. Scott Smith (Aug 13)
- URL exploit to crash Opera Browser Zac Leow C.H (Aug 13)
- Re: ps(1) for freebsd. JDC (Aug 13)
