Bugtraq mailing list archives
SSH 1 Why?
From: dpz () POBOX COM (Daniel P. Zepeda)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 21:26:10 -0600
Hi,
I've seen a lot of discussion about SSH 1 on this list. I read
somewhere that even the authors of SSH recommended that SSH1 *not* be used
anymore because there were some major holes in it, and that anybody
serious should upgrade to SSH2. What am I missing here?
--
Daniel P. Zepeda
dpz () pobox com
"May the Schwartz be with you." -- Yogurt in Spaceballs. (MMM, yummy!)
Current thread:
- Re: Local / Remote D.o.S Attack in War FTP Daemon 1.70 Vulnerability, (continued)
- CERT Advisory CA-99-16 Buffer Overflow in Sun Solstice AdminSuite Daemon sadmind Elias Levy (Dec 14)
- Statement: Local / Remote D.o.S Attack in War FTP Daemon 1.70 Jarle Aase (Dec 16)
- sshd1 allows unencrypted sessions regardless of server policy Markus Friedl (Dec 14)
- Re: sshd1 allows unencrypted sessions regardless of server policy Michael H. Warfield (Dec 14)
- Re: sshd1 allows unencrypted sessions regardless of server policy Pavel Machek (Dec 14)
- Re: sshd1 allows unencrypted sessions regardless of server policy Joseph Moran (Dec 14)
- Re: sshd1 allows unencrypted sessions regardless of server policy David Schwartz (Dec 15)
- SSH-1.2.27 & RSAREF2 exploit Iván Arce (Dec 14)
- SSH 1 Why? Daniel P. Zepeda (Dec 14)
- Re: SSH 1 Why? Emiliano Kargieman (Dec 15)
- Re: SSH 1 Why? Emiel Kollof (Dec 15)
- Re: SSH 1 Why? Iván Arce (Dec 16)
- Re: SSH 1 Why? R. J. Wysocki (Dec 18)
- Groupewise Web Interface Sacha Faust Bourque (Dec 19)
- Re: Groupewise Web Interface Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Dec 20)
- Re: Groupewise Web Interface Bayard G. Bell (Dec 21)
- Announcement: Solaris loadable kernel module backdoor plasmoid (Dec 20)
- Re: Announcement: Solaris loadable kernel module backdoor pedward () WEBCOM COM (Dec 21)
- Re: Announcement: Solaris loadable kernel module backdoor Marc Esipovich (Dec 22)