Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep
From: christos () ZOULAS COM (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:42:31 -0500
On Jan 4, 12:11pm, babinebell () TRUSTCENTER DE (Goetz Babin-Ebell) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep
| At 21:24 03.01.00 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
| >Hi all,
| Hallo Olaf,
|
| >when you're dealing with files in /tmp that are supposed to be re-opened
| >(rather than opened once and then discarded) there's an established
| >way to do it which goes like this:
| >
| > if (lstat(fname, &stb1) >= 0 && S_ISREG(stb1.st_mode)) {
| > fd = open(fname, O_RDWR);
| > if (fd < 0 || fstat(fd, &stb2) < 0
| > || ino_or_dev_mismatch(&stb1, &stb2))
| > raise_big_stink()
| > } else {
| > /* do the O_EXCL thing */
| > }
|
| I did something that way:
|
| FILE *DoOpen(const char *cpFile, long bAppend)
| {
| FILE *spNew;
| FILE *spTest;
| struct stat sStat;
|
Bug 1:
Now you create a file if it does not exist, so I can
use your little program as a denial of service attack.
This is why open(O_RDWR) was used above instead of
(O_RDWR|O_CREAT).
| spTest = fopen(cpFile,"a");
| if (!spTest)
| {
| Log("ERR FILE OPEN",cpFile);
| return NULL;
| }
Bug 2:
You've just added a race condition; I could have renamed
the file between the fopen() and lstat(). This is why the
example is using fstat()
| if (lstat(cpFile,&sStat))
| {
Bug 3:
Now you forgot to close the file before you returned.
| Log("ERR STAT",cpFile);
| return NULL;
| }
| if ((sStat.st_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFLNK)
| {
| fclose(spTest);
| Log("ERR ISLINK",cpFile);
| return NULL;
| }
| if (bAppend)
| spNew = spTest;
| else
| {
Bug 4:
You've just added another race condition; I could have renamed
the file between the lstat() and fopen().
| spNew = freopen(cpFile,"w",spTest);
| fclose(spTest);
| }
| if (!spNew)
| {
| Log("ERR FILE OPEN",cpFile);
| return NULL;
| }
| return spFile;
| }
Moral of the story: Stick with the code in the example and don't roll
your own; use fdopen() if you need stdio afterwards.
I hope that you are not writing any security critical code...
christos
Current thread:
- Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Olaf Kirch (Jan 03)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Mark A. Heilpern (Jan 03)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Casper Dik (Jan 04)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Olaf Kirch (Jan 04)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Henrik Nordstrom (Jan 04)
- First Telecom E-conso service totally insecure Thomas Quinot (Jan 03)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Goetz Babin-Ebell (Jan 04)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep pedward () WEBCOM COM (Jan 04)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Christos Zoulas (Jan 04)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Mikael Olsson (Jan 05)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Marc Heuse (Jan 05)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Wietse Venema (Jan 04)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Pavel Machek (Jan 04)
- Security problem with Solstice Backup/Legato Networker recover command Chris Siebenmann (Jan 04)
- Local / Remote D.o.S Attack in IMail IMONITOR Server for WinNT Version 5.08 Ussr Labs (Jan 05)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Pavel Kankovsky (Jan 05)
- [RHSA-2000:002] New lpr packages available Bill Nottingham (Jan 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep der Mouse (Jan 03)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Marc Heuse (Jan 04)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Symlinks and Cryogenic Sleep Mark A. Heilpern (Jan 03)
