Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug..
From: fred () CHEETAHMAIL COM (Frederik Lindberg)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 13:07:51 -0500
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:57:16 -0700, Elias Levy wrote:
Travis Ogdon <togdon () easystreet com>: This is also true for all messages with the following invalid headers: Return-Path: <>
This is a valid header for [double-]bounces, added at the time of final
delivery, in this case the POP3/IMAP server when the envelope sender is
NULL. See rfc1123:
5.2.13 RFC-822 Message Specification: RFC-822 Section 4
The syntax shown for the Return-path line omits the
possibility
of a null return path, which is used to prevent looping of
error notifications (see Section 5.3.3). The complete syntax
is:
return = "Return-path" ":" route-addr
/ "Return-path" ":" "<" ">"
The set of optional header fields is hereby expanded to
include
the Content-Type field defined in RFC-1049 [SMTP:7]. This
field "allows mail reading systems to automatically identify
the type of a structured message body and to process it for
display accordingly". [SMTP:7] A User Agent MAY support this
field.
-- Fred
Frederik Lindberg, CTO, CheetahMail
Current thread:
- Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug.. Matthew J. Brown (Jun 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug.. Elias Levy (Jun 09)
- Re: Microsoft Outlook (Express) bug.. Frederik Lindberg (Jun 11)
