Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: More info for E*TRADE users
From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh () POP JARING MY>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:42:48 +0800
At 10:29 AM 25-09-
beginning. Furthermore, if it happened that you had missed additional ways the vulnerability might be exploited (for example, in combination with one or more other vulnerabilities) then it could turn out that your advice for minimising exposure will not protect e-trade customers as much as you thought. By not revealing all information and allowing open discussion the situation may even be worse than if you'd said nothing at all.
The trouble is the people who really need to read Bugtraq aren't doing it ;). I suspect most of the aspiring attackers are reading Bugtraq. The decent defenders are reading Bugtraq. But the clueless coders aren't. And I believe the clueless coders vastly outnumber the Bugtraq'ers. In just the past few days I've seen 4 web apps with security issues. 2 free scripts and 2 proprietary on live sites. I've only been bothering with the free scripts because some people at work keep asking me if certain scripts would be useful for the office or secure. Cheerio, Link.
Current thread:
- More info for E*TRADE users Jeffrey W. Baker (Sep 23)
- Re: More info for E*TRADE users Christian (Sep 25)
- Re: More info for E*TRADE users Lincoln Yeoh (Sep 27)
- Re: More info for E*TRADE users Greg A. Woods (Sep 27)
- Re: More info for E*TRADE users Lincoln Yeoh (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: More info for E*TRADE users George, Michael (Sep 27)
- Re: More info for E*TRADE users Christian (Sep 25)
