Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re[2]: HTML email "bug", of sorts.
From: Mark Tinberg <tinberg () securepipe com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:39:24 -0500 (CDT)
I think that Walter hinted at another scheme that hasn't yet been explicitly mentioned. By making a request like the one below the spammer can use their DNS server logs to track messages, even if all TCP access is blocked by a personal firewall. The answer, as stated below, is that any email client that does HTML mail should be highly restricted on what tags it interprets (no "active" content) and should not display anything that didn't come included with the message. Possibly there should be a special DTD just for this purpose. On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Walter Hop wrote: ..SNIP..
http://4747683621.spammer.com/
..SNIP..
Some mailers like "The Bat" have their own HTML engine that refuses to do HTTP requests at all. This seems the best solution.
-- Mark Tinberg <MTinberg () securepipe com> Network Security Engineer SecurePipe, Inc. -- Managed Network Security Services Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
Current thread:
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. thomas . rowe (Aug 19)
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Thor (Aug 19)
- RE: HTML email "bug", of sorts. David LeBlanc (Aug 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. james_kelley (Aug 19)
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Alex Prestin (Aug 19)
- Re[2]: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Walter Hop (Aug 20)
- Re[2]: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Mark Tinberg (Aug 20)
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Peter W (Aug 21)
- Re[2]: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Walter Hop (Aug 20)
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Bear Giles (Aug 20)
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Sean Straw / PSE (Aug 21)
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Curt Sampson (Aug 21)
- RE: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Ben Yu (Aug 20)
- Re: HTML email "bug", of sorts. Jeffrey W. Dronenburg (Aug 21)
