Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Verified evasion in Snort
From: mwatchinski () sourcefire com
Date: 1 Feb 2006 21:22:01 -0000
This and other target base fragmentation evasions are the reason we re-wrote the fragmentation engine in Snort.
If you look at Judy Novak's Frag3 Development paper, Snort's latest fragmentation engine (frag3) supports target-based
fragmentation policies for overlaps, ttl evasions, and timeouts. This can be configured on a per IP basis to allow
exact emulation of how the end host handles fragmentation reassembly.
Here is a sample configuration that could be used for frag3. This configuration would handle the evasion outlined in
the advisory. This configuration is based on the 5 second timeout used in the PoC code provided.
preprocessor frag3_engine: policy first \
bind_to 10.2.1.0/24 \
timeout 5 \
detect_anomalies
From our testing, Windows XP actually has a 1 minute timeout for fragments. The actual configuration to handle this evasion would be the following:
preprocessor frag3_engine: policy first \
bind_to 10.2.1.0/24 \
timeout 60 \
detect_anomalies
For the VRT's detailed analysis of the PoC tool and the advisory please see:
http://www.snort.org/rules/docs/vrt/evasion_snort_v233.html
Cheers,
Matthew Watchinski
Director, Vulnerability Research
Sourcefire, Inc.
Current thread:
- Re: Verified evasion in Snort Thierry Zoller (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Verified evasion in Snort mwatchinski (Feb 01)
- Re: Re: Verified evasion in Snort anonpoet (Feb 02)
- Re: Re: Verified evasion in Snort Dave Korn (Feb 03)
