
Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results)
From: "Greg Wroblewski" <Greg.Wroblewski () microsoft com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:39:28 -0800
The only attack vector we know about for Win9x, ME platforms is through printing. I'm afraid that "fixing" that would break some functionality. Greg ------------ This post is provided as is and confers no rights or whatever. -----Original Message----- From: Joe Polk [mailto:listuser.jav () gmail com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 6:21 AM To: Brett Glass Cc: bugtraq () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Brett Glass wrote:
Question: Is Ilfak's patch still needed for Windows 95, 98, SE and ME systems, for which Microsoft is refusing to provide a patch? To what extent are these systems vulnerable if not patched? --Brett Glass
Actually, Ilfak never tested his patch on a Win 9x machine. Steve Gibson, however, plans to write a patch for 95, 98, and ME if Microsoft doesn't. JP
Current thread:
- Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Gadi Evron (Jan 06)
- Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Brett Glass (Jan 09)
- Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Joe Polk (Jan 10)
- Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Denis Jedig (Jan 11)
- Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Joe Polk (Jan 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Greg Wroblewski (Jan 11)
- Re: Did MS pull an Ilfak? (MS patch bindiff results) Brett Glass (Jan 09)