Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow)
From: Martin Schulze <joey () infodrom org>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:13:26 +0100
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Sendmail is, as we know, the most used daemon for SMTP in the world. This is an International Infrastructure vulnerability and should have been treated that way. It wasn't. It was handled not only poorly, but irresponsibly.
The documentation is distressingly vague.
Now, the same holds true with OpenSSH. I'll tell you what. If there is ever a security problem (again :) in OpenSSH we will disclose it exactly like we want, and in no other way, and quite frankly since noone has ever paid a cent for it's development they have nothing they can say about it.
Theo, this is not about paying or not paying, it is not about owing somebody something, but about sensible disclosure of security problems to the world. Sendmail has been an important part of the Internet infrastructure and has gained a lot of honour and respect. Many people use this piece of software and a lot of distributors/vendors are proliferating this software. They do deserve better, as do the users who decide to trust this vendor.
Or run something else.
Maybe this is indeed the way to go. There are several other
feature-rich mail transport agents.
Regards,
Joey
--
Open source is important from a technical angle. -- Linus Torvalds
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
Current thread:
- SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Gadi Evron (Mar 23)
- trusting SMTP [was: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities] Gadi Evron (Mar 23)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] trusting SMTP [was: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities] Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 24)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Dragos Ruiu (Mar 23)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Theo de Raadt (Mar 24)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Martin Schulze (Mar 24)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Theo de Raadt (Mar 24)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) D.F.Russell (Mar 25)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Kurt Seifried (Mar 27)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Gadi Evron (Mar 25)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Geo. (Mar 28)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Martin Schulze (Mar 24)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Pim van Riezen (Mar 27)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Florian Weimer (Mar 27)
- Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Casper . Dik (Mar 28)
- trusting SMTP [was: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities] Gadi Evron (Mar 23)
- RE: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow) Michael A Fusaro II (Mar 25)
