Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability
From: emacs25 () gmail com
Date: 23 Nov 2007 18:35:35 -0000
"Very High" might be a little to much, but just a little imho
Last PDF vuln was "Very High"... IMHO! :). If you don't see any difference between those two vulns, this discussion is useless. :)
Current thread:
- Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability j00ru . vx (Nov 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability gg_vuln (Nov 22)
- Re: Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability emacs25 (Nov 23)
- Re: Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability j00ru . vx (Nov 23)
- Re: Re: Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability gynvael (Nov 23)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability sdfkjsomcoismwevoiweo (Nov 23)
- Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability emacs25 (Nov 23)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gadu-Gadu Local/Remote Buffer Overflow vulnerability gynvael (Nov 23)
