Secure Coding: by date
RSS Feed
About List
All Lists
Previous period
207 messages
starting Apr 01 04 and
ending Jun 30 04
Date index |
Thread index |
Author index
Thursday, 01 April
Re : virtual server - use jail(8) on FreeBSD Serban Gh. Ghita
RE: virtual server - security Alun Jones
RE: virtual server - IPS Jeremy Epstein
Re: virtual server - security James Walden
Change of position Gary McGraw
Administrivia: A note on moderation and thanks Kenneth R. van Wyk
Re: Change of position Dana Epp
Re: Change of position ljknews
RE: Change of position Gary McGraw
DHS report Gary McGraw
Friday, 02 April
Re: Something about virtual servers and php jnf
Re: Re : virtual server - use jail(8) on FreeBSD Crispin Cowan
Re: Change of position Peter G. Neumann
Report seeks more secure world for software development Greenarrow 1
Last call for attacking systems kung fu Gary McGraw
RE: Change of position Dave Paris
RE: Report seeks more secure world for software development Gary McGraw
[Fwd: secure software engineering methodology - aftermath] Mads Rasmussen
Re: Report seeks more secure world for software development Jared W. Robinson
Monday, 05 April
Building Security In: #2 Gary McGraw
Tuesday, 06 April
Trusted Software Development Methodology David A. Wheeler
Dot Net guidelines? Bret Watson
Wednesday, 07 April
RE: Dot Net guidelines? Nick Lothian
RE: Dot Net guidelines? Anil John
RE: Dot Net guidelines? Hans Westphal
RE: Dot Net guidelines? Kreusch, Stephen (ZA - Johannesburg)
Friday, 09 April
Secure coding education James Walden
Re: Secure coding education jnf
Chicago Area Free MSFT Security Summit Hans Westphal
Tuesday, 13 April
Computerworld op/ed on vulnerability patch cycle Kenneth R. van Wyk
Wednesday, 14 April
Webcast and article Gary McGraw
Webcast on Developing Secure Code Greenarrow 1
New Security Flaw DataBase is Up Greenarrow 1
RE: Computerworld op/ed on vulnerability patch cycle Alexander Antonov
Re: Computerworld op/ed on vulnerability patch cycle Kenneth R. van Wyk
Thursday, 15 April
Questions when interviewing new people Mads Rasmussen
RE: Questions when interviewing new people Browne, Derek
Re: Questions when interviewing new people Eric Murray
RE: Re: Questions when interviewing new people David Crocker
RE: Re: Questions when interviewing new people jnf
Monday, 19 April
Anyone looked at security features of D programming language? Kenneth R. van Wyk
Yoran on the state of software security Kenneth R. van Wyk
Tuesday, 20 April
Re: Yoran on the state of software security Kenneth R. van Wyk
Missing the point? Michael A. Davis
Seeking topics for upcoming eSecurityPlanet columns Kenneth R. van Wyk
Re: Missing the point? Dave Aronson
Re: Missing the point? Mads Rasmussen
Re: Missing the point? Paco Hope
Re: Missing the point? Pascal Meunier
Re: Missing the point? Pascal Meunier
Re: Missing the point? Nash
RE: Missing the point? Alun Jones
Wednesday, 21 April
RE: Missing the point? Michael A. Davis
Re: Missing the point? Jared W. Robinson
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language? James Walden
RE: Missing the point? Peter Amey
Thursday, 22 April
Re: Yoran on the state of software security Greenarrow 1
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language? Greenarrow 1
Re: Hoglund on Screensavers tonight Paco Hope
Hoglund on Screensavers tonight Gary McGraw
Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Jim & Mary Ronback
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? ljknews
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Kenneth R. van Wyk
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Gary McGraw
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? James Walden
Re: Yoran on the state of software security Nick FitzGerald
Friday, 23 April
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Jim & Mary Ronback
RE: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Peter Amey
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? der Mouse
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language? Crispin Cowan
RE: Missing the point? Michael S Hines
RE: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Jeremy Epstein
RE: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? ljknews
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming la nguage compared to Spark? Jim & Mary Ronback
Python, Ruby, Perl & PHP Fabien
Monday, 26 April
Comparing Programming Languages Greenarrow 1
Re: Yoran on the state of software security Greenarrow 1
Re: Missing the point? Crispin Cowan
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Crispin Cowan
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Crispin Cowan
RE: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Michael Canty
Re: Anyone looked at security features of D programming language compared to Spark? Blue Boar
Re: Comparing Programming Languages Terrence Enger
Thursday, 29 April
White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies Kenneth R. van Wyk
Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies dtalk-ml
RE: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies Jeremy Epstein
Friday, 30 April
Re: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies James Walden
Re: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies Tad Anhalt
Re: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies ljknews
RE: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies Dave Paris
MIT study on software development processes Kenneth R. van Wyk
Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies der Mouse
Monday, 03 May
Vulnerability Auditing Checklist Mads Rasmussen
Re: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies Glenn and Mary Everhart
Re: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies Crispin Cowan
Re: Python, Ruby, Perl & PHP James Walden
Re: auditing James Walden
Re: auditing jnf
auditing jnf
Re: auditing ljknews
RE: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Ma ny Spies Jeremy Epstein
Re: auditing ljknews
Re: auditing Jose Nazario
Re: auditing Crispin Cowan
Re: auditing Paco Hope
Tuesday, 04 May
Re: Re: White paper: "Many Eyes" - No Assurance Against Many Spies Tad Anhalt
Re: Vulnerability Auditing Checklist Steven M. Christey
RE: Vulnerability Auditing Checklist Barney, Rickie
Schneier on the web Gary McGraw
Wednesday, 05 May
Washington DC area talk on Exploiting Software Gary McGraw
Re: auditing jnf
Re: Vulnerability Auditing Checklist Alfonso Alba García
SD Magazine conversation with Bruce Schneier Benjamin Pick
Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation Steven M. Christey
Thursday, 06 May
Re: SD Magazine conversation with Bruce Schneier Jared W. Robinson
Re: Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation jnf
RE: Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation Gary McGraw
RE: Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation Dave Paris
Re: Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation Steven M. Christey
Friday, 07 May
Re: Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation jnf
Re: Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation Mads Rasmussen
Re: Off-by-one errors: a brief explanation Pascal Meunier
Monday, 10 May
Interesting Articles on IBM's Research & Development Web site Michael S Hines
Friday, 14 May
Administrivia: List outage Kenneth R. van Wyk
Thanks for the suggestions for my column Kenneth R. van Wyk
Monday, 17 May
Hardened PHP (0.1.1) released Kenneth R. van Wyk
Clarke: Hold Developers Accountable for Software Insecurity Kenneth R. van Wyk
Tuesday, 18 May
Security ramifications of AOP and AspectJ Jared W. Robinson
Re: Security ramifications of AOP and AspectJ Yves Younan
Wednesday, 19 May
InformationWeek: Executives Complain About Software Vulnerability To Hackers Kenneth R. van Wyk
Thursday, 20 May
Andy Tanenbaum on Linux's origins and security Kenneth R. van Wyk
Friday, 21 May
Re: Andy Tanenbaum on Linux's origins and security der Mouse
Wednesday, 26 May
LinuxWorld | Secure coding attracts interest, investment Kenneth R. van Wyk
Microsoft threat modeling tool available for free Kenneth R. van Wyk
Interesting article on minimizing privileges Kenneth R. van Wyk
Friday, 28 May
Java code checker R Sean Eidemiller
Saturday, 29 May
Re: Andy Tanenbaum on Linux's origins and security Fernando Schapachnik
Thursday, 03 June
Re: LinuxWorld | Secure coding attracts interest, investment Mars IMAP
Monday, 07 June
More host-based production security tools unveiled Kenneth R. van Wyk
Tuesday, 08 June
Re: More host-based production security tools unveiled Crispin Cowan
Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Kenneth R. van Wyk
opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Jose Nazario
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Jeff Williams
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness ljknews
Wednesday, 09 June
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Florian Weimer
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness der Mouse
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Kenneth R. van Wyk
RE: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Peter Amey
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Gary McGraw
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness ljknews
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness David Eisner
RE: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Alun Jones
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness ljknews
RE: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness David Crocker
Determina claims 100% protection against all buffer overflows Thor Larholm
RE: Determina claims 100% protection against all buffer overflows Thor Larholm
RE: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness ljknews
RE: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security John Steven
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness der Mouse
Thursday, 10 June
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Damir Rajnovic
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Blue Boar
Secure Coding - is that the end of the story? Michael S Hines
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Crispin Cowan
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Jared W. Robinson
Friday, 11 June
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Dana Epp
RE: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness David Crocker
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness Crispin Cowan
RE: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness ljknews
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security ljknews
Re: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness der Mouse
RE: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Michael S Hines
RE: opinion, ACM Queue: Buffer Overrun Madness David Crocker
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Crispin Cowan
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security der Mouse
IBM OS Source Code Michael S Hines
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Crispin Cowan
RE: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security ljknews
Saturday, 12 June
RE: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Wall, Kevin
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Andreas Saurwein
Re: Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security Crispin Cowan
Tuesday, 15 June
Interview Gary McGraw
RE: Determina claims 100% protection against all buffer overflows Gary McGraw
Origins of Security Problems Mark Rockman
Wednesday, 16 June
RE: Origins of Security Problems Michael S Hines
RE: Origins of Security Problems Dave Paris
Thursday, 17 June
RE: Origins of Security Problems ljknews
Origins of Security Problems Mark Rockman
Friday, 18 June
Re: Origins of Security Problems Crispin Cowan
Re: Origins of Security Problems ljknews
Sunday, 20 June
RE: Origins of Security Problems ljknews
RE: Origins of Security Problems Alun Jones
Monday, 21 June
RE: Origins of Security Problems Alun Jones
Thursday, 24 June
Administrivia: Moderator is back Kenneth R. van Wyk
Monday, 28 June
ACM Queue - Content Kenneth R. van Wyk
SPI, Ounce Labs Target Poorly Written Code Kenneth R. van Wyk
Tuesday, 29 June
Re: SPI, Ounce Labs Target Poorly Written Code Blue Boar
RE: SPI, Ounce Labs Target Poorly Written Code Peter Amey
RE: SPI, Ounce Labs Target Poorly Written Code ljknews
Re: SPI, Ounce Labs Target Poorly Written Code Blue Boar
Wednesday, 30 June
Re: SPI, Ounce Labs Target Poorly Written Code James Walden
ACM Queue article and security education James Walden
Re: ACM Queue article and security education ljknews
Re: ACM Queue article and security education Peter G. Neumann
Re: ACM Queue article and security education Kenneth R. van Wyk
Re: ACM Queue article and security education James Walden
RE: ACM Queue article and security education Michael S Hines
Re: SPI, Ounce Labs Target Poorly Written Code Crispin Cowan