Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did
From: H D Moore <hdm-daily-dave () digitaloffense net>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:55:55 -0600
OpenBSD had a minimal user base, more vulns would have been found if there was a reason to dig for them in the first place. Additionally, Theo hadn't pissed off an army of determined bug hunters yet :) Windows 98 had quite a few remote vulns. There were the Winsock stack issues (all those fun DoS attacks), there was the NetBIOS share name password disclosure/bypass bug, and some serious disclosure issues when then file sharing was enabled. The second you dropped any network service onto the system, you opened up another flood of vulnerabilities. I have run into 98 boxes running SQL Server 7, IIS 4.0, Personal Web Server, etc. The best thing about 98 and network services was the "..." directory traversal attacks... Software which runs reasonable securely on NT 4.0 becomes a gaping security hole when you install it on a 9x box. On Wednesday 04 February 2004 08:11 pm, Sinan Eren wrote:
for some serious phun here it goes.principle in the design stage? Does anyone seriously believe that Win 98 is more secure than OpenBSD?yes i DO. lets roll time back to 1998 with all you current sploits
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did, (continued)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Anton A. Chuvakin (Feb 04)
- RE: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Chris Eagle (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Blue Boar (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Dave Aitel (Feb 04)
- RE: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Chris Eagle (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Matt Hargett (Feb 04)
- RE: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Chris Eagle (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Gunnar Peterson (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Sinan Eren (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did H D Moore (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Sinan Eren (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did H D Moore (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Blue Boar (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact thathaveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even ifthey did Matt Hargett (Feb 04)
- RE: Lame studies that people quote as fact that haveno basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did Rodney Thayer (Feb 04)
- Re: Lame studies that people quote as fact that have no basis in reality and still don't prove anything even if they did the grugq (Feb 04)
