Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Self updating worms?
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:41:34 -0700
Oded H wrote:
There is a clear benefit for the bad guys espcially if we are talking about organized crime to have a self updating worm, simply because although they dont want to leave a trail they would like to get some exclusive access to a victom host. Adding some defence (i.e. patch) to the vulnerability on which their worm arrived is a step at that direction.
You don't need "worm" bits (attack vectors) to maintain a botnet, you only need those to grow one. If someone sells off a fixed set of 1000 zombies, they probably don't want the customer competing with them for new bots. In fact, the seller would probably be quite happy that there is a natural attrition of the bot set, so they can sell more to the same buyer later.
Assuming of course that the builders and users of botnets are mutually exclusive sets.
BB
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Self updating worms? Jonathan Wilkins (Sep 09)
- Re: Self updating worms? Gadi Evron (Sep 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Self updating worms? Kohlenberg, Toby (Sep 09)
- RE: Self updating worms? Anton A. Chuvakin (Sep 09)
- RE: Self updating worms? Dave Aitel (Sep 09)
- RE: Self updating worms? Anton A. Chuvakin (Sep 09)
- RE: Self updating worms? Jonathan Wilkins (Sep 09)
- Re: Self updating worms? Gadi Evron (Sep 09)
- Re: Self updating worms? Dave Aitel (Sep 09)
- Re: Self updating worms? Gadi Evron (Sep 09)
- Re: Self updating worms? Oded H (Sep 10)
- Re: Self updating worms? Gadi Evron (Sep 10)
- Re: Self updating worms? Blue Boar (Sep 10)
- RE: Self updating worms? Jonathan Wilkins (Sep 10)
- Re: Self updating worms? robert (Sep 10)
- RE: Self updating worms? Jonathan Wilkins (Sep 13)
- Re: Self updating worms? robert (Sep 13)
