Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: A view askew?
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:06:17 +0200
Dave Aitel wrote:
I have to say, it's certainly odd that Microsoft was able to convince US-CERT, SANS, most of the major IDS vendors, and a few other people to not release alerts on the WINS bug, which came out last Thursday, until tommarow morning. It's not Thanksgiving anywhere but here, but all your security efforts were hamstrung by Microsoft to fit a US audience.
I just discussed this with a friend, and we both agreed this is not evil or lame, it is just that they are plain and simple winnies. :P
Seriously though.. as my friend said, they are treating security as a PR issue rather than anything else. And this is how you deal with PR problems.
If anything, they are heading backwards in regards to security.One interesting note is that bugtraq did let it through moderation.. what does that say about SYMC and MS relations?
We have all seen cases in the past where security information did not go through this or that security mailing list because it was not beneficial to this or that owner.
Now it seems like the time has come where security knowledge can be held back almost completely for commercial reasons AFTER it has been released.. this is not right and I am not sure if I have any solution at hand that I can think of.
Perhaps a list of sites that did publish it needs to be made? SecuriTeam is usually straight with these things - www.securiteam.org.
Gadi.
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- A view askew? Dave Aitel (Nov 28)
- RE: A view askew? Mike Bailey (Nov 28)
- Re: A view askew? Dragos Ruiu (Nov 29)
- Re: A view askew? Gadi Evron (Nov 29)
- RE: A view askew? Aleksander P. Czarnowski (Nov 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: A view askew? Aleksander P. Czarnowski (Nov 29)
- Re: A view askew? Dave Aitel (Nov 29)
