Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail)
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:20:01 +0200
* Frank Knobbe:
While it may veil and protect private services, so do many other mechanism (like IPSec tunnels, or my favorite, SSH).
Neither protects you from worms that target the protection technology. (Okay, maybe IPsec tunnnels with static keys are rather robust, but I didn't look at the protocol too closely. ISAKMP certainly isn't.) A parser guarded by a HMAC seems to be a good choice, but this approach is not widely used, unfortunately. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://www.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) David Maynor (Oct 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Maynor, David (ISS Atlanta) (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) John Bryson (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Florian Weimer (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Paul Wouters (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Sandino Araico Sánchez (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Frank Knobbe (Oct 20)
- RE: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail(RPC-Mail) Paul Wouters (Oct 20)
