Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: ACM
From: ken_i_m () fatair net
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:16:27 -0700
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:52:02AM +0200, Gadi Evron (ge () linuxbox org) wrote:
I quite agree, but currently, even if we don't like them, these lines are put forth by democratic governments (the ones we discussed anyway)/ Would you rather it be any other way? Please elaborate.
I am not feeling particularly generous towards the "elected leaders" of these "democratic governments" at the moment. I spent a recent non-work wake cycle following my curiosity. It started with a comment about a book "Barry and 'the boys'", which led among other places to John Stockwell, and then by the long way round to John Perkins and his recent book, "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man". Then a visit to Allan Dulles and Mossadegh. Which led pretty much directly to Bechtel and Casper Weinburger, George Schultz, William Casey, et al. Which came full circle via Reagan to Barry Seal with George H.W. Bush's private phone number on a piece of paper in his wallet when he was killed by a Columbian hit squad. (From an interview with Noam Chomsky by Amy Goodman) "....here [in USA] we have a thing called an election, which is a choice between two men, both born to great wealth and political influence, and went to the same fancy private schools, same elite university, joined the same secret society where you train people to be members of the ruling class. They can run because they're funded by pretty much the same concentrations for private power." No, this general sort of stuff is not news to me. What was interesting was the sheer volume of creditable material (e.g. the CIA published Hitz report) that I was able to review in a single 12 hour period of looking. The implication is that anyone who denies what our "elected leaders" are really doing is someone who simply can not be taken seriously. Any intelligent person, in our affluent society, has to work pretty hard not to be aware of this stuff. They have to be shoving their head pretty far up their ass. No, it does not jusify in any way the writing of malware. But on a scale of criminality maybe malware authors are not quite as evil as other 'bad actors'. have a nice day, -- Ken Dyke "Bits at the speed of light" _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: ACM, (continued)
- Re: ACM Florian Weimer (Jan 10)
- Re: ACM Erick Dahan (Jan 10)
- Re: ACM ken_i_m (Jan 10)
- Re: ACM Peter Busser (Jan 11)
- RE: ACM Chris Eagle (Jan 11)
- Re: ACM plonky (Jan 11)
- Re: ACM Andre Ludwig (Jan 11)
- Re: ACM Gadi Evron (Jan 11)
- Re: ACM ken_i_m (Jan 11)
- Re: ACM Gadi Evron (Jan 11)
- Re: ACM ken_i_m (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM dan (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM ken_i_m (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM Richard Thieme (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM Paul Wouters (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM ken_i_m (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM ken_i_m (Jan 10)
- Re: ACM Cedric Blancher (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM Anthony . zboralski (Jan 12)
- Re: ACM Nicob (Feb 02)
