Dailydave mailing list archives
RE: Funny note here on a worm
From: "Kyle Quest" <Kyle.Quest () networkengines com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 13:31:37 -0400
I don't have any issues with Sourcefire charging for the rules updates and if folks want to chat about it on this list, I can save us all a lot of time by posting the for/against threads from the various Nessus, Snort, vuln-watch mailing lists.
I don't care if they charge for the rules either. What's sad is how this GPL project is changing... especially how the GPL rules all of a sudden became SourceFire rules. What's sad is how the business people are exploiting the project. This why they have this silly advisory about the worm being developed. This is pure marketing talk to make SourceFire ,as a company, sound important. Now to address what Jason wrote:
I fail to see how you can come to that conclusion.
I know how the marketing talk sounds. You can recognize it based on how it's worded and how much information is provided. It takes practice to recognize this kind of thing.
To label it a sales and marketing tool is an injustice and shows that you really have no clue what it is or what goes into deciding how to balance open source and commercial.
I'm just pointing out the facts.
I think Sourcefire has done a great job to date and I expect that to continue.
I'm not saying that they haven't, but you should realize yourself that like in any commercial company you are dealing with different forces. On one hand, you got technical guys who are doing great things for Snort and, on the other hand, you have business guys who are trying to make money any way they can... exploiting anything they can...
Snort is the same as it has always been. Snort is released under the GPL. When you go to work for free and spend millions of dollars and man-hours developing a technology that others think they own you might understand the rules licensing change.
Two words for you: "Linux kernel". Kyle _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: Funny note here on a worm, (continued)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Gadi Evron (Apr 30)
- RE: Funny note here on a worm Kyle Quest (May 01)
- Message not available
- RE: Funny note here on a worm Ron Gula (May 01)
- Interesting call for research... halvar (May 01)
- Re: Interesting call for research... Dave Aitel (May 01)
- Re: Interesting call for research... Gadi Evron (May 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Jason (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Jason (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Gadi Evron (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Jason (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Jason (May 01)
- Re: Funny note here on a worm Gadi Evron (May 01)
- bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Gadi Evron (May 01)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Ron Gula (May 01)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] byte_jump (May 01)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Ron Gula (May 02)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Gadi Evron (May 03)
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] John Lampe (May 03)
- Message not available
- Re: bleeding nessus [was: Re: Funny note here on a worm] Gadi Evron (May 03)
