Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Ah, oo, uh, ie.
From: H D Moore <hdm-daily-dave () digitaloffense net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:54:37 -0600
The IObjectSafety problem, as it relates to instantiable non-ActiveX COM
objects, is still a major issue in IE. This allows you to crash IE with a
single object creation call, such as:
<script>
a = new ActiveXObject("OutlookExpress.AddressBook");
</script>
Real complicated eh? This was reported to MSRC, along with another dozen
IE DoS bugs, about a month ago. The biggest problem with fixing COM
object bugs seems to be figuring out who the actual author is. What sucks
is finding a trivially exploitable COM object on your system and having
no idea what application is responsible for installing it...
More browser rambling can be found on the Metasploit blog:
http://metasploit.blogspot.com/2006/03/browser-fuzzing-for-fun-and-profit.html
-HD
On Thursday 30 March 2006 16:40, Dave Aitel wrote:
I wonder if Mike's been talking to one of the DCOM designers. This
sounds like something they'd think up.
DCOM Designer: "Yo, so the server can call RpcImpersonateClient(), but
not if the client has called SetCloaking("Definitely Not"). but if the
registry has the "Cloaking: Not such a good thing" dword set to 1 then
it still can. Clear?"
ProgrammersProgrammersProgrammers: "Sure!"
Haha. That API cracks me up every time.
Current thread:
- Ah, oo, uh, ie. Dave Aitel (Mar 30)
- Re: Ah, oo, uh, ie. Bryan Burns (Mar 30)
- Re: Ah, oo, uh, ie. H D Moore (Mar 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Ah, oo, uh, ie. Williams, James K (Mar 31)
