Dailydave mailing list archives
Parallelism
From: Dave Aitel <dave () immunityinc com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:55:17 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone else find it odd that Elcomsoft is getting a lot of press for something relating to cracking on video cards, when you could just write your cracker in RapidMind and be done with the whole problem? No doubt that was one of RapidMind's early test programs. In any case, it's interesting that Linux Journal and MSDN Magazine are both focused on parallelism lately. Both of them are a bit "off" in my opinion. The answer is going to be a language that abstracts data access that extra layer to make parallelism something your compiler does for you. It's not going to be parallel additions to already non-parallel languages. You have to love the "caveats" in MSDN Magazine about using "Only one parallel loop at a time". And also "Parallel exceptions in LINQ are non-deterministic"! Imagine the hilarious security side effects from these sorts of half-backed parallel solutions. - -dave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHJgJjB8JNm+PA+iURAoFBAJsEKNVtzfBtXNKAgncZZ2+K8Vy1FwCgn1NF +J6SZ7idN0oYLr6E9cKQic4= =coMQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Parallelism Dave Aitel (Oct 29)
- Re: Parallelism Curt (Oct 29)
- Re: Parallelism Florian Weimer (Oct 29)
- Re: Parallelism Stephen John Smoogen (Oct 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Parallelism Kristian Erik Hermansen (Oct 29)
