Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Google Apps Engine
From: "Thomas Ptacek" <tqbf () matasano com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:22:15 -0500
If you own the interpreter codebase, shouldn't it be possible just to hook libc's open(2) stub, and give a unique signature to calls that originated on a trusted code path? This doesn't seem at all hard to me. On 4/12/08, Aidan Thornton <makosoft () googlemail com> wrote:
On 4/11/08, Lutz Böhne <lboehne () damogran de> wrote:
> > Even those could easily be sanitized by just some fun with function
> > pointers.
> >
> > >>> open=lambda *x: "no"
> > >>> open('/etc/passwd')
> > 'no'
>
> Unless there are other ways to find these functions:
>
> >>> __builtins__.__dict__["open"]( '/etc/passwd')
> <open file '/etc/passwd', mode 'r' at 0xb7dac7b8>
>
> or even:
>
> >>> open=lambda *x: "no"
> >>> open('/etc/passwd')
> 'no'
> >>> del open
> >>> open('/etc/passwd')
> <open file '/etc/passwd', mode 'r' at 0xb7db44a0>
>
> Python is fun, there are so many ways to have it do what you want ;)
>
> It might be possible to remove these functions like this:
>
> >>> del __builtins__.__dict__["open"]
> >>> open('/etc/passwd')
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> NameError: name 'open' is not defined
> [...]
>
> But i don't know whether that'd get rid of all problems.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lutz
>
Hi,
The quick answer is no, it wouldn't be enough. For example, try
type(sys.stdin)('/etc/passwd') or the equivalent
sys.stdin.__class__('/etc/passwd'). Also, as
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067291.html
points out, file can be obtained from object.__subclasses__(). (object itself can be found by working up the
inheritance tree from any new-style class - say, a string - using __bases__)
Python's powerful introspection support and lack of data hiding make
doing any sort of meaningful sandboxing within the language itself very difficult. There used to be a bundled module
called rexec to do this (via a combination of hooks into the interpreter and built-in support), but it was
depreciated due to security issues. They might be doing something similar - it seems to strip what functions from
native-code modules can be imported to some safe whitelist (and load all modules written in Python within the
sandbox).
Aidan
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
-- --- Thomas H. Ptacek // matasano security read us on the web: http://www.matasano.com/log _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Google Apps Engine Dave Aitel (Apr 08)
- Re: Google Apps Engine jf (Apr 08)
- Re: Google Apps Engine Jeremy Kelley (Apr 08)
- Re: Google Apps Engine jf (Apr 08)
- Re: Google Apps Engine Lutz Böhne (Apr 11)
- Re: Google Apps Engine Jeremy Kelley (Apr 11)
- Re: Google Apps Engine Aidan Thornton (Apr 12)
- Re: Google Apps Engine Thomas Ptacek (Apr 13)
