Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd)
From: Robert Lemos <lists () robertlemos com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:29:57 -0500
On Dec 10, 2008, at 1:27 AM, BEES INC wrote:
you would be better off writing insurance and collecting a premiums, and if something does happen the payout could go to covering costs of patching and recovery. i'm pretty sure ive read of something like this being already available.
IANA financial analyst, but...Futures typically only work as a hedge for commodities, where quality is a constant and the supply-demand relationship is the only variable. Because the quality of vulnerabilities vary so widely, it would be hard to create a futures market around them.
However, wine futures might be a good model to base this one. Wine futures typically are sold after the wine is casked, but before it is bottled. So you have some knowledge of the potential quality of the wine, but not of the finished product. I could imagine that trusted groups of researchers could indicate that they are working on finding vulnerabilities in a certain product and had found several of undetermined quality. They could sell the results on the open market, a few months to a few years before their research is finished.
Of course, there are plenty of caveats to this analogy: 1) Wine is atoms, vulns are bits.2) The researchers would have to take care or their sale could be (or at least appear to be) extortion. 3) You could argue that there is generally only one legitimate buyer -- the developer whose software you are auditing -- for the product, severely limiting the market.
Likely, this would only work on the underground market, because of the point 3. In the legitimate market, the model would default to the "pay for a trusted auditor to audit your software" deal that is already in existence.
-R | robert lemos | mail () robertlemos com | twit: rlemos_security | | managing editor | securityfocus | www.securityfocus.com | | technology journalist | http://www.robertlemos.com |
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) sinan . eren (Dec 09)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) security curmudgeon (Dec 09)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) BEES INC (Dec 10)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) Jon Passki (Dec 10)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) BEES INC (Dec 11)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) Jon Passki (Dec 11)
- Robert Seacord on the CERT C Secure Coding Standard Robert Seacord (Dec 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Robert Seacord on the CERT C Secure Coding Standard Robert Seacord (Dec 17)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) Jon Passki (Dec 10)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) Matthew Wollenweber (Dec 11)
- Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd) Charles Miller (Dec 11)
