Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked!
From: romain <r () fuckthespam com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:29:39 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just to let you know that Fortify actually released the full version of the document in which I expected more interesting results... http://blog.fortify.com/repo/Fortify-SHA-3-Report.pdf Romain David Molnar wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dave Aitel <dave () immunityinc com> wrote:Lots of new security technologies look like this: [some automated process] ----> [some small team of really skilled people] ----> results. This is great stuff, but it's not "scalable" in the sense that the sales team will imply.To hijack the thread a bit, this feels like a key area for research. To start with, we have techniques like fuzz testing that get us a lot of the way there by providing actual test cases to developers, but right now it is hard to figure out automatically if the test cases produced are 0) important (i.e. exhibit an exploitable bug), 1) not a duplicate of a previous bug For 0) I like Pusscat's Byakugan work, there's also this work by Lin et al. http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/zlin/file/DSN08.pdf Of course we won't ever be able to match a true expert, but we can provide some value and triage. For 1) I can think of a few heuristics (and have implemented two) based on "fuzzy" stack hashes, but I don't have a lot of evidence that any one of them works well at separating out "distinct" bugs without leading to too many duplicates. What are other "human bottlenecks" for everyone's favorite analysis techniques? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJqKGTPqFffxxIpwoRAiHkAJ0dNeKRnoFUD2nj5E5OTdszXpDP3wCeNvgB 95QK8mcYLOypcmTXd436d34= =u4Y2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Dave Aitel (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Halvar Flake (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Dave Aitel (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! David Molnar (Feb 25)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! romain (Feb 28)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Dave Aitel (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! silky (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Tal Garfinkel (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Alexander Sotirov (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Chris Eng (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! romain (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Michal Zalewski (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Tal Garfinkel (Feb 24)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Halvar Flake (Feb 23)
- Re: It jerked and it berked but the thing really worked! Adam Shostack (Feb 24)
