
Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: DARPA CGC Recap
From: Chris Eagle <cse.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:10:56 -0700
If you want to be able to do all of the performance measurements then yes that code is missing. If you want to study the successful PoVs then that code is not required. Most of them can be replayed on the publicly available VMs. However some of them depend on the specific CPUID values returned by the CFE hardware which you might need to emulate somehow. Even if all the code used to run the final event was released, the CPUID issue would continue to be a problem unless you are able to return the same CPUID values that the competitors saw during CFE. On 4/11/2017 10:38 AM, Ryan Stortz wrote:
Notably missing are: * The kernel they ran the final event on * The code they used to measure scores This prevents a lot of analysis.
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunityinc com https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- DARPA CGC Recap Dan Guido (Apr 09)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap David Manouchehri (Apr 11)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap Chris Eagle (Apr 11)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap Julio Auto (Apr 18)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap Ryan Stortz (Apr 18)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap Chris Eagle (Apr 18)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap Dave Aitel (Apr 20)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap David Manouchehri (Apr 21)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap Chris Eagle (Apr 21)
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap David Manouchehri (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: DARPA CGC Recap Tyler Nighswander (May 02)