BreachExchange mailing list archives
Re: Stolen laptop returned to Beaumont Hospital
From: Chris Walsh <cwalsh () cwalsh org>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:51:24 -0500
Indeed, the ability to copy a disk w/out altering it is necessary in order for evidence to hold up in court. If the police change the disk by examining it, then how could the defense independently examine the same body of evidence? http://www.cftt.nist.gov/disk_imaging.htm is a useful link, IMO. Chris On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:49:36PM -0700, George Toft wrote:
In the wake of similar statements in the VA laptop case, I talked to a computer forensics expert and he confirmed that as long as Windows was not used to access the drive, then the markers used to indicate file access will remain intact and indicate no access.
_______________________________________________ Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () attrition org) http://attrition.org/dataloss Tracking more than 142 million compromised records in 315 incidents over 6 years.
Current thread:
- Stolen laptop returned to Beaumont Hospital lyger (Aug 23)
- Re: Stolen laptop returned to Beaumont Hospital World Privacy Forum (Aug 24)
- Re: Stolen laptop returned to Beaumont Hospital George Toft (Aug 24)
- Re: Stolen laptop returned to Beaumont Hospital Chris Walsh (Aug 27)
- Re: Stolen laptop returned to Beaumont Hospital George Toft (Aug 24)
- Re: Stolen laptop returned to Beaumont Hospital World Privacy Forum (Aug 24)
