Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Auto-update versus "going green"
From: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:41:35 -0400
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:17:55 EDT, Jeff Kell said:
We are running into issues with our NAC policy enforcement with machines that are set for some power-save / power-off profiles and consequently not auto-updating themselves. When they are turned on for use, they are missing patches and out-of-compliance, and can run into remediation/quarantine.
This sounds like a job for 'wake-on-LAN' if your BIOS and network card support it. Poke each machine at oh-dark-thirty, have it wake up, look for updates, and go back to sleep.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Auto-update versus "going green" Jeff Kell (Oct 08)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" Valdis Kletnieks (Oct 08)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" SCHALIP, MICHAEL (Oct 08)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" Koerber, Jeff (Oct 14)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" Parker, Ron (Oct 08)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" Alan Amesbury (Oct 14)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" Todd Clementz (Oct 14)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" SCHALIP, MICHAEL (Oct 08)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" Jeff Kell (Oct 08)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" SCHALIP, MICHAEL (Oct 08)
- Re: Auto-update versus "going green" Valdis Kletnieks (Oct 08)
