Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Deepfreeze - Why not?
From: "Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl)" <mclaugkl () UCMAIL UC EDU>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:23:32 -0500
Hi All: This being the security forum I wouldn't say it would be crazy not to install DeepFreeze - I would agree that discussions about it should take place but keep in mind that if someone uses one of those systems to commit a crime or commit activity that is short of criminal but that the University would still want to determine who the culprit was DeepFreeze makes that discovery much more difficult if not impossible. - Kevin Kevin L. McLaughlin, CISM, CISSP, GIAC-GSLC, CRISC, PMP, ITIL Master Certified Assistant Vice President, Information Security & Special Projects University of Cincinnati 513-556-9177 The University of Cincinnati is one of America's top public research institutions and the region's largest employer, with a student population of more than 41,000. [cid:image001.gif@01CCA545.4A094630] From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Crary, Gregory Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:11 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Deepfreeze - Why not? In labs...? It'd be crazy not to install DeepFreeze. Aside from the obvious risks of not, there are many cost-efficiencies as a result of using the tool. -- Gregory T. Crary Director, Customer Support Systems Office of information Technology Eastern Washington University gcrary () ewu edu<mailto:gcrary () ewu edu> | 509.359.2375 From: "Sarazen, Daniel" <dsarazen () UMASSP EDU<mailto:dsarazen () UMASSP EDU>> Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv <SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:05:25 -0800 To: "SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>" <SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>> Subject: [SECURITY] Deepfreeze - Why not? Hi All, We have some folks who'd like to see Deepfreeze installed on all lab PCs, but the IT department is balking. What do people think is the best reason to not install deepfreeze? Is there one? Thanks, Dan
Current thread:
- Deepfreeze - Why not? Sarazen, Daniel (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Crary, Gregory (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Allen Wood (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Sam Stelfox (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Chuck Keeler (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Mark Monroe (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Heath Barnhart (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Gibson, Nathan J. (HSC) (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Rob Whalen (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Michael Sana (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Schoenefeld, Keith P. (Nov 17)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Nov 17)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Deepfreeze - Why not? Crary, Gregory (Nov 17)
