Re: Guest wireless restrictions

[Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU>]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:26:47 -0400, Derek Diget said:

> What are you going to do for sites that offer with IMAP on 143 with
> LOGINDISABLED and STARTTLS?  It isn't any less "secure" than IMAP on 993
> with SSL

Does anybody significant actually do this?  I haven't seen anybody doing
IMAP on 143 in ages - everybody sane is on 993.

> How do you tell the difference with a message submission over 587 that
> does not require STARTTLS before any SMTP AUTH and one that does?

Ditto. It's been ages since I saw anything that didn't require STARTTLS first.

And it's 2013 - certainly time to name-and-shame people who *still* can't
get this basic security stuff right.

Attachment: _bin
Description: