Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights
From: "Barton, Robert W." <bartonrt () LEWISU EDU>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:58:26 +0000
It is a user issue, but don’t forget about lateral movement of viruses (viruses can be ‘dormant’ in a file on the network), that mistakes happen, and that if a user account falls into the wrong hands. They all add up to an issue that can be resolved; a bank of 30,000 had few to no regular users with local administrator rights, or a way to escalate. Your BYOD should be segmented off to their own network with less direct access to resources. On the statistics (misuse of admin privs vs other vectors), I would have to go hunting (I know they are out there). I’ve been following the suggestions of expert articles, and an onsite review. But here is an related tidbit. [cid:image003.jpg@01D4332F.3B1B9590] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/17/02/26/1047257/94-of-microsoft-vulnerabilities-can-be-mitigated-by-turning-off-admin-rights Robert W. Barton Director of Information Security Lewis University One University Parkway Romeoville, IL 60446-2200 815-836-5663 From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv <SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> On Behalf Of randy Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 5:44 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Restricting PC Admin Rights Interesting thread. I have a couple of questions: 1. What is the problem we're trying to solve? a. Seems to me the problem isn't a user having admin rights, rather, it's a poorly trained user with admin privs that' the problem. So, why not create a training program for people who want admin privs? Seems to me that's a win-win. We get an extra set of eyes to help spot problems, users get the flexibility they want/need. I saw an earlier post saying you need a highly responsive support infrastructure to help users do their job. If your IT staff can't handle immediate requests for users, then we get in the way of their job. b. What about BYOD? I'm sure most of us are heavily into BYOD which means those users already have admin privs. Which brings me back to training. 2. Are there metrics showing the ratio of breaches caused by misuse of admin privs vs other vectors? Whether a user has admin privs isn't going to affect their files being hit by a ransomware attack. Just curious..... -Randy Marchany VA Tech IT Security Office and Lab This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone at (815)-836-5950 and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. Thank you.
Current thread:
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights, (continued)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Boyd, Daniel (Aug 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Richard Gould (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Frank Barton (Aug 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Burns, Denis (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Frank Barton (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Burns, Denis (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Simanovich, Roman (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Burns, Denis (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Barton, Robert W. (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights randy (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Barton, Robert W. (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Boyd, Daniel (Aug 13)
- Re: Restricting PC Admin Rights Barton, Robert W. (Aug 13)

