Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Firewall performance
From: David C Niemi <niemi () tux org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:53:31 -0400 (EDT)
By the way, 3 copies for routing an IP packet under Linux is way off, not even Linux 1.0 did that many ;^) 2.2 will typically do a DMA in and a DMA out and appropriate futzing of headers; and there is a special case to do direct NIC-to-NIC transfers with certain hardware to cut out one of those DMAs (if I understand NET_FASTROUTE option correctly). DCN On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Ryan Russell wrote: ...
Still has to use NT routing code, no? Just not the socket calls.
This could still be significant, couldn't it? I've read that the
*BSDs can router IP with 1 memcpy of the packet, while Linux
takes 3. Not being terribly impressed with NT networking,
I assume something equally bad or worse with NT.
Ryan
----- David C Niemi ----niemi at tux.org---- Reston VA USA ----- Software is largely a service industry operating under the persistent but unfounded delusion that it is a manufacturing industry. -- Eric S Raymond
Current thread:
- Re: Firewall performance Sandy Green (Jun 23)
- Re: Firewall performance Chris Brenton (Jun 23)
- Re: Firewall performance Lance Spitzner (Jun 23)
- Re: Firewall performance Carric Dooley (Jun 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Firewall performance Choi, Byoung (Jun 23)
- RE: Firewall performance sean . kelly (Jun 23)
- RE: Firewall performance Marcus J. Ranum (Jun 23)
- RE: Firewall performance David LeBlanc (Jun 28)
- RE: Firewall performance Ryan Russell (Jun 24)
- RE: Firewall performance David C Niemi (Jun 28)
- Re: Firewall performance Darren Reed (Jun 29)
- Re: Firewall performance Mike Shaver (Jun 29)
- Re: Firewall performance Darren Reed (Jun 29)
- RE: Firewall performance David C Niemi (Jun 28)
- RE: Firewall performance David LeBlanc (Jun 28)
