Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways
From: jfa () sphere com (John F. Appel)
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 15:12:50 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
(ASCII art below, used fixed-width font)
Randy,
Cleanest way is to have a second internal router inside the firewall,
which then becomes the default gateway for the internal network.
Your end picture looks like this:
|----------|
| Internet |
| router |
|----------|
|
|
|
|----------|
| Firewall | <--- This will probably need
|----------| static routes to all of
| internal networks, including
| those via the alternate GW
|
|----------| |---------| |---------|
| Internal |------------| LAN |-------------|Alternate|
| router | |---------| | Gateway |
|----------| |---------|
^
| This becomes default
|---------- gateway for your LAN; uses
inside interface of FW as
default GW
Used and working in a number of places. 8-) Of course, this assumes
that what's beyond the alternate gateway is trusted (or that you can
make management care if it isn't fully trusted...)
Cheers,
John
John Appel
Sphere Solutions, Inc.
410-552-4077 x452
jfa () sphere com
PGP public key available
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-firewall-wizards () lists nfr net
On Behalf Of Randy Witlicki
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2000 6:44 PM
To: firewall-wizards () nfr net
Subject: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways
Hello,
I'm wondering if anybody has come up with a reasonable
solution to static routes for Windows 95/98/NT laptop users
in networks with a firewall and *another* gateway.
If we have a setup where:
- The default route points to the firewall on the local
network, and;
- You need an additional route to point to a gateway for
some private network (either via VPN or a private (leased line
or frame relay) link).
(e.g.: the route to 0.0.0.0 is 10.0.0.1 and the route to
172.16.0.0/16 is 10.0.0.2)
Specific problems I have run into include:
- With a PIX firewall, even you don't mind having packets
bounce off the PIX inside interface, it won't let you. If you
have a "route inside" statement, you get an error of the form:
106011: Deny inbound (No xlate) tcp
src inside:X.X.X.X/1047 dst inside:Y.Y.Y.Y/23
Which is the PIX's way of saying it refuses to receive a
packet on the inside interface and resend it to a gateway
on the inside. So you need a route on each host inside.
- If you have a "route add" in a startup .BAT file on a 95 or
98 PC or a "route add -p" on an NT PC, if it is a laptop and that
laptop travels to the remote network the "route add" is pointing
at, then you need a .BAT file to reverse the startup .BAT file.
I assume you might have similar problems with a *nix laptop.
Is there a way to get one of these systems to listen to
RIP or something similar ?
I think I can do this with DHCP, but at least one of the
networks involved is very small and it would be nice to avoid
having to to setup a DHCP server (and having one more server
piece to depend on).
Thanks in advance for any advice and help !
- Randy
-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOHEDTInk6/0SBQzlEQI6EgCgzmdCb8N7XyswPNVuGzCUrgAhxDoAoPtX oC+8NbawxZZkLO7rbJojH/UU =CPY5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways Randy Witlicki (Jan 03)
- Re: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways Csiri (Jan 03)
- Re: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways Bill Pennington (Jan 03)
- Re: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways Rodney van den Oever (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways Ben Nagy (Jan 03)
- RE: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways John F. Appel (Jan 03)
- FW: Firewalls, PC static routes, gateways dave . goldsmith (Jan 04)
