
Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: PIX Firewall Resilience Question
From: Mike Barkett <mbarkett () digex net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 01:18:35 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Garrahan, Kelvin wrote: GK>Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:28:31 -0000 GK>From: "Garrahan, Kelvin" <Kelvin.Garrahan () compaq com> GK>To: "'firewall-wizards () nfr net'" <firewall-wizards () nfr net> GK>Subject: PIX Firewall Resilience Question GK> GK>Failover between the Firewalls is handled by the PIX failover cable. GK> GK>My questions are; GK> GK>1) Can you have two interfaces connected to the same network even if each GK>interface resides on a separate switch? Yes, at a very simple level, just connect the switches via crossover(s). You'll want something that with a good STP that can handle two crossovers, i.e. Catalyst switches. Although redundant crossovers are not as necessary with the PIX HA, since that is handled via the failover cable. GK>2) If the above can be done how is routing handled? from memory you assign GK>routes to interfaces GK> GK>I think even if the above works the rules base would become very GK>complicated. GK>Thanks in advance GK> Not necessarily. If I remember correctly, under PIX version 4.23 and up, you just configure the primary like normal, tell it about the secondary, and it updates the secondary when you 'wr mem'. There is another command like 'wr system' or 'wr failover' that escapes me right now, which will just write to the secondary. GK> GK>Kelvin Garrahan GK>Security Consultant GK>Compaq Professional Services, GK>Park House, GK>N.C.R., GK>Dublin 7. GK>Tel: 353-1-8385433 GK>Fax: 353-1-8384239 GK>Email: Kelvin.garrahan () compaq com GK> <<Garrahan, Kelvin.vcf>> Dublin, eh? I'll be there for St. Patty's day. Where's the place to be/avoid? -MAB
Current thread:
- PIX Firewall Resilience Question Garrahan, Kelvin (Mar 02)
- Re: PIX Firewall Resilience Question Mike Barkett (Mar 03)
- Re: PIX Firewall Resilience Question Bill Pennington (Mar 05)