Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Re: Anti-Defacement Products...
From: Mikael Olsson <mikael.olsson () enternet se>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:21:34 +0200
...sorry for my late follow-up... i hope it may provide some insight. Jonathan Squire wrote:
The eGap is a hardware device that physically disconnects your external server from the inside network, it does not pass Network protocols at all, rather it just passes the transaction data (the url) through to an inside box that servers the request. If the external boxes is compromised, the sensitive material (your web pages) are not exposed to modification, as the external machine does not contain the content.
This product was subject to a fair amount of scrutiny on the firewalls mailing list a while ago. The basic opinion was that for web servers, the eGap URL shuttle won't do much more for you than a basic firewall will do. The greatest dangers in web servers are with port 80, or, more specifically, the processing of URLs. Since the eGap URL shuttle, by definition, has to pass the URLs to the web server, you aren't really that "separated" from the dangers at hand as the marketing drones would have you think. For instance, the RDS bug that is the source of most NT defacements the past 6 months or so, would work just fine through the eGap, unless it is configured to block the specific RDS-related URLs. All other kinds of SQL fun (inserting escape chars in posted forms and querystrings, etc) works just as well, and it won't provide any (added) protection to script engine weaknesses and its ilk. That said, according to the Whale Comms people, it is possible to inspect URLs and drop "known bad" ones. However, this is also possible in most proxy-like firewalls, but it is reactive defense (add a filter when the exploit is public) rather than proactive (prevent all future weaknesses no matter their nature). DISCLAIMER 1: I have not used nor evaluated the eGap, but the above facts have been discussed several times over on the firewalls list, and the Whale sales reps could not refute the above facts. If you think that network layer separation buys you a lot of protection, by all means, buy the product. If you think that the dangers lay in the processing of URLs themselves (as I do)... Well :-) DISCLAIMER 2: Whale Communications also have other eGap products for other specific tasks. I have no opinion whatsoever about them. For all I know, they may be great products. I have only discussed the URL shuttle in this e-mail. Regards, /Mikael
Current thread:
- RE: Re: Anti-Defacement Products... Jonathan Squire (May 05)
- Re: Re: Anti-Defacement Products... Mikael Olsson (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Anti-Defacement Products... Predrag Zivic (May 19)
