Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls?
From: Jan van Rensburg <jan.van.rensburg () epiuse com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:58:12 +0200
hi, ms exchange needs 3 ports, all tcp. port 135 (ms portmap equivalent), and 2 others: 1 for the directory service, and 1 for the information service (data). the last 2 can be set to anything you want in the registry at: HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeDS\Parameters and HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIS\ParametersSystem the 136-139 ports are not needed. i think the mapi vs pop/imap security is reference to the clear text over the network that everything for pop/imap usually uses. ms exchange has some light encryption between the server and users. i suspect pop/imap over ssl might be even better. --jan _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Joseph S D Yao (Feb 25)
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Chris Crozier (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Joseph S D Yao (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Michael Nelson (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Patrick Darden (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Rick Murphy (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Ben Nagy (Feb 26)
- Re: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Joseph S D Yao (Feb 26)
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Jan van Rensburg (Feb 26)
- RE: POP vs IMAP vs MAPI - security through firewalls? Chris Crozier (Feb 26)
