Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC
From: TC Wolsey <tc () thebiz net>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:33:42 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ryan Russell wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Eric Vyncke wrote:As a Cisco employee, I would be afraid of changing the default behavior of a router. This would generate thousands of calls to our support center of people complaining: 'this was working before but after upgrade it does not work anymore' (for people having a non 'leaf-subnet')... ;-)I realize there would be a period of pain. I'm of the opinion that Cisco just has to suck it up and take one for the team.As you probably know, this command is already existing under a more esoteric form: ip verify unicast reverse-pathBeing on by default is the key, by my thinking. Ryan
ip verify unicast reverse is actually more useful than what Ryan is suggesting which is to something like ip verify connected reverse. (Which come to think of it would not be a bad option to have) I do have to agree with Eric though that Cisco can not be expected to take unilateral action to implement this by default. If the router requirements RFC was updated to make this a strong SHOULD than router manufacturers could at least claim that they were complying with the standards to the best of their ability. There is one middle-ground path that I can think of - since we are talking about Internet connected routers, make ip verify unicast reverse the default in the S (Service Provider) train of IOS code. If you are running S train IOS and you do not understand the implications of ip verify unicast reverse than you either need new support staff or you should be in another business. BTW ip verify unicast reverse is only really useful for keeping an origin from sourcing spoofed packets, it will still allow spoofed packets in from Martian networks unless you route those to null also. Regards, --tcw _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC Ryan Russell (Jan 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC Gary Flynn (Jan 31)
- Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC Ryan Russell (Jan 31)
- RE: DDOS Countermeasures RFC jan (Jan 31)
- Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC Ryan Russell (Jan 31)
- Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC TC Wolsey (Feb 03)
- Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC jan (Jan 31)
- Re: DDOS Countermeasures RFC daN. (Jan 31)
- RE: DDOS Countermeasures RFC Ryan Russell (Jan 31)
