Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Traffic Management
From: "Paul Heber" <pheber () qantas com au>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:19:15 +1000
The other one you may wish to consider that works very well is the
Packeteer device. This does full TCP rate control by modifying the TCP
window and ack times. Again you can specify percentages of flow, plus URL
priority etc etc.
Also running as a seperate device will not load down your firewall
Regards
Paul Heber
Ph: (+612) 9691 4545
Mobile: (+614) 1231 0945
Fax: (+612) 9691 4660
"Safier, Adam
(GEIO)" To: Rama Kant <kant () adeptech com>, bparis () sorrentolactalis
com, firewall-wizards () fraggle nfr net
<Adam.Safier () geio ge cc:
.com> Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Traffic Management
Sent by:
firewall-wizards-adm
in () nfr com
13/02/2001 05:46
Check Point offers a product called Floodgate that lets you set priority by
% or max kbps. There are several other product vendors that offer similar
products dedicated to traffic shaping/control. Cisco routers also have a
parameter that lets you limit certain types of traffic to a max bandwidth.
If you are using a caching proxy you may be able to set a bandwidth limit
on
that proxy. The result of all these is that certain categories of traffic
(http vs. ftp vs. e-mail vs. specific ports) get throttled. The better
solutions can specify bandwidth by protocol and source/destination so your
e-mail server to corporate HQ server can get 50% of the bandwidth while
non-corporate smtp gets 10% and http gets 5% etc.
They all require establishing a corporate policy and then setting up some
rules.
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Rama Kant [mailto:kant () adeptech com]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 7:34 PM
To: bparis () sorrentolactalis com; firewall-wizards () fraggle nfr net
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Traffic Management
You should look into bandwidth shaping solutions. One that I have personal
experience with, used to be called AccessPoint from Xedia. This company
was sold to Lucent over a year ago. These routers use "Class Based
Queuing" to allocate available bandwidth based on applications as well as
IP addresses.
Cisco also has "Quality of Service" products but I found AccessPoint to be
more effective.
Good luck,
Rama Kant
At 11:55 AM 02/09/2001, bparis () sorrentolactalis com wrote:
Folks,
Recently we've been experiencing "congestion" of our internet
pipe.
We've tried restricting various thing like Napster, Gnutella and the like with varying degrees of success, but as more and more users come onto our LAN/WAN we've noticed our performance decreasing. Rather than manage this
at
our firewall (with many many rules), I'd like to know how you manage your
traffic. What do you use?
I apologize if this question seems off topic, but thought I would
toss it out there and see what comes back...
Bill Paris
Telecommunication/Network Analyst
Sorrento Lactalis Inc.
bparis () sorrentolactalis com
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () nfr com
http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Traffic Management bparis (Feb 11)
- RE: Traffic Management Steven Osman (Feb 12)
- Re: Traffic Management Rama Kant (Feb 12)
- Re: Traffic Management Firewall Team (Feb 13)
- Re: Traffic Management Swift Griggs (Feb 15)
- Re: Traffic Management Firewall Team (Feb 16)
- Re: Traffic Management Ng Pheng Siong (Feb 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Traffic Management Alex Goldney (Feb 12)
- RE: Traffic Management Safier, Adam (GEIO) (Feb 13)
- RE: Traffic Management Paul Heber (Feb 14)
