Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: regarding poduct
From: "Loomis, Rip" <GILBERT.R.LOOMIS () saic com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:22:40 -0500
The solution would appear to be:
1. Have a database indicating which accounts
are paid up, and their expiry date. Be
able to export the list of "newly expired
users" every night at 1 AM (for example).
2. Every night at 2 AM (for example) have a
script run under cron (or the NT equivalent
service) that locks all the newly expired
accounts.
A better variation would be for the locking
routine to actually query for account status
in real time, and get a list of all valid
account names (from the payment database) and
their status. Then the locking routine could
review all the accounts in existence and take
one of the three following actions:
1. Account is valid and paid up - no action
2. Account is valid but expired - lock it
3. Account is invalid - call in the cavalry
to investigate unusual event.
I could write such a setup, with Perl scripts
and .dbm files for the backend and a web
administrative front end, in a couple
of hours and test it in a couple of days.
So could any good UNIX system administrator,
and you could do similar if not identical
things using Microsoft tools.
I must say as an editorial comment (and I would
feel obliged to point this out to a customer
as well) that this is a crappy business model
and I hope you aren't depending on this as
your principal revenue...but I hope this helps.
Rip Loomis Voice Number: (410) 953-6874
--------------------------------------------------------
Senior Security Engineer
Center for Information Security Technology
Science Applications International Corporation
http://www.cist.saic.com
-----Original Message----- From: sathyanarayanan [mailto:satsv55 () yahoo com] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:54 PM To: John Adams; firewall-wizards () nfr com Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] regarding poduct hi John, i had little bit phrased the question wrongly, it is not webserver, but getting into the internal network itself.(as we normally map a drive or space to someother guy from our system , giving right for him to use in our computer.) Likewise the client would be given right to somespace for accessing his files stored by us , inside our network , for a stipulated lease period. when the period expired he should pay again to get the rights to access the files.I am just wondering whether there is any software that would do automatically disabiling the client when the lease period expires. thanks yours sathya --- John Adams <jna () retina net> wrote:You can handle this using existing system tools. If your webserver is Solaris or Linux, use 'usermod' If your webserver is NT, use Users and Groups to set an expiry date for his account. -john On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, sathyanarayanan wrote:Hi guys, I am in search of a product which does the following function. When a client comes to our office and gets a loginidto access our webserver for a period of time. when the time period expires , we are in need of product which denies him access to our web serverorweb site or the files to which he is given access, automatically . Is there a any security product , which preventshisaccess by temporary locking his computer fromaccessto our site, using his IP address or our IPaddress,unless we give him a password , which enables him again to access our site. yours sathyanarayanan__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- regarding poduct sathyanarayanan (Mar 11)
- Re: regarding poduct John Adams (Mar 13)
- Re: regarding poduct sathyanarayanan (Mar 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: regarding poduct Loomis, Rip (Mar 16)
- RE: regarding poduct J B (Mar 18)
- Re: regarding poduct John Adams (Mar 13)
