Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts () patriot net>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:06:11 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
in the past. If you're a true white hat, you're not replete with hacking technique and you're not the kind of guy who can whip out a tool to crack into any website any time, or whatever. UNfortunately,
I'm not sure I totally agree with this premise- I think I couldsit and find and code exploits on my test network if I had the time. I most certainly could run the kiddie tools, and let's face it, there isn't really all that much to "hacking technique" until you start to get into really sophisticated stuff- finding overflows and races is certainly doable if you're completely clean- you just have to do it on your own stuff.
have that kind of problem with thier customers...) So you have to either become a repository of hacking technique yourself, totally steer clear of hacking technique, or have friends who have the
If you're looking at the currently exploited vulnerabilities (kind of the "Wild list" in the attack space) then you don't really need to code your own tools- you may end up messing around with offsets, fixing purposefully broken exploits, etc. - but it's not all that difficult...
hacking knowledge who can step in every so often and back you up. So, unfortunately, because our customers have been media-trained and hacker-marketed to be stupid* many security professionals are now in the situation where they feel they can be embarrassed if their hacker buddies get pi*sed off at them and the well of information runs dry. I managed to get over and around this problem
I think the biggest trouble with the current scenerio is that many, many customers don't understand that you don't *need* the attack tools to mount an effective defense, nor to tell what's wrong with the current one. I think even vulnerability scanners are mostly a waste of time. Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions proberts () patriot net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- concerning ~el8 / project mayhem R. DuFresne (Aug 16)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Darren Reed (Aug 16)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ark (Aug 16)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Marcus J. Ranum (Aug 17)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ark (Aug 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Marcus J. Ranum (Aug 17)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Paul D. Robertson (Aug 17)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Anton A. Chuvakin (Aug 21)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Paul Robertson (Aug 21)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Barney Wolff (Aug 21)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Anton J Aylward, CISSP (Aug 21)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Anton Chuvakin (Aug 21)
- RE:Vulnerability Scanners ( was: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem ) Josh Welch (Aug 21)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Dave Piscitello (Aug 21)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Anton J Aylward, CISSP (Aug 21)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Paul D. Robertson (Aug 17)
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Darren Reed (Aug 16)
- Message not available
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Dave Piscitello (Aug 22)
- Message not available
- Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem Dave Piscitello (Aug 22)
