
Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Gauntlet Rule Interpretation
From: "Johann van Duyn" <Johann_van_Duyn () bat com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:59:31 +0200
Hi there... I am arguing with our network manager regarding the interpretation of Gauntlet (on BSD Unix) rulesets. My knowledge of Gauntlet is not very deep, but I can read, and I am sure that I am interpreting the rules correctly. The ruleset says NOTHING specific about SNMP traffic, either by proxy name or by port number. However, some of our rules look like this: authenIP: permit-forward -if ef1 -proto * -srcaddr a.b.c.d:255.255.255.255 -dstaddr w.x.y.z:255.255.255.255 -srcport * -dstport * authenIP: permit-forward -if exp0 -proto * -dstaddr a.b.c.d:255.255.255.255 -srcaddr w.x.y.z:255.255.255.255 -dstport * -srcport * Surely such a rule would let SNMP traffic from a.b.c.d to w.x.y.z and vice-versa? Or am I missing something here? Where else (other than the main rulebase, where searches for 'SNMP', '161' and '162' are fruitless) should I look to find if SNMP traffic is indeed blocked? Even if the SNMP proxy were disabled, wouldn't the Gauntlet act as a stateful proxy filter given the above rule (-srcport * -dstport *)? Thanks! ----------------------------------------- Johann van Duyn Confidentiality Notice: The information in this document and attachments is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Internet communications are not secure and therefore British American Tobacco does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. If you are not the intended recipient,please notify us immediately and then delete this document. Do not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor take any copies. Violation of this notice may be unlawful. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Gauntlet Rule Interpretation Johann van Duyn (Feb 13)
- Re: Gauntlet Rule Interpretation Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Gauntlet Rule Interpretation Meenoo_Shivdasani (Feb 13)