Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Log checking?
From: "Rodel Collado Urani" <sparc () ucomputer org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:23:40 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:12:11 -0700 "Paul D. Robertson" <paul () compuwar net> wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Luke Butcher wrote:It's for this reason I always setup IDS(ii?) inside the firewall.I'monly worried about what gets through, what's blocked is history.That's still pretty much logging "known bad" though, isn't it? Heck, if it's known bad, I want to stop it, not alert on it. Blocked getting ignored was pretty much my default too, since we had enough attacks a day that following up would have taken at least one person, maybe more.It also has the nice side effect of monitoring what people insideyournetwork are up to. Which for all practical purposes are the onlyonesyou can actually do anything about.
Its good thing to monitor all servers running critical applications but doing this requires too much work unless there is someone tasked on looking every possible security breaches. Since email has been always considered a necessity for everyone handling systems and network admin (SNA) then one thing that may lessen work than just monitoring every activities that the system may occur is by setting an email relay on every servers that may alert and administrator whatever is happening in those servers such as unauthorized icmp packets, spam, et al.
Well, that's one of my reasons for doing permits- more fun to be had LARTing the lusers.Sometimes if there is no IDS in place (or even if there is dependingonthe client), I'll log permits on the firewall but only on moregenericrules e.g. allow inside to ftp to anywhere. Logging everythingcangenerate too much data, and your signal to noise ratio drops meaningyoumight miss something.I didn't constantly monitor everything, but I'd do it as a routine. I also felt that it would help me make a "routine process" case if we ever got challenged for a dismissal. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions paul () compuwar net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
RODEL COLLADO URANI -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.4 wkYEARECAAYFAkFbb/QACgkQQ7QUZrvBIZ22ygCgoX4dzR50IDnc9jxUs49FbRv9YUAA oITIkTI7bZSUHWlN5SlHpNFP73x6 =zMG+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Log checking?, (continued)
- Re: Log checking? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 30)
- Re: Log checking? Devdas Bhagat (Sep 30)
- Re: Log checking? Mark Tinberg (Sep 30)
- Re: Log checking? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 30)
- RE: Log checking? Desai, Ashish (Sep 28)
- Re: Log checking? Adam Shostack (Sep 28)
- RE: Log checking? Luke Butcher (Sep 28)
- RE: Log checking? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 28)
- RE: Log checking? Ben Nagy (Sep 30)
- RE: Log checking? Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 30)
- RE: Log checking? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 28)
- RE: Log checking? Rodel Collado Urani (Sep 30)
- RE: Log checking? Fiamingo, Frank (Sep 30)
- RE: Log checking? Larry Pitcher (Sep 30)
- RE: Log checking? Luke Butcher (Sep 30)
- RE: Log checking? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 30)
