Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Equifax Canada
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul () compuwar net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:07:32 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, R. DuFresne wrote:
But are the worth of the data here merely relational to the cost of contacting those clients whose information was compromised? Maybe to the
The value of the data to the custodian of the data is a lot less than it is to the attacker or person who's data it is.
company, but, I'm willing to bet the clients consider this data much more vauable then that, I would, and their costs, the clients is not yet ended, esepcially if their victims of identity theft...
Nope, their clients aren't really the folks they're keeping the data on...
It is true, they loose some credibilityWhich is another sense of the value and loss incurred in this case, an additional loss.
But it doesn't really matter to their clients. Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions paul () compuwar net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Equifax Canada Paul D. Robertson (Jun 19)
- Re: Equifax Canada Adrian Grigorof (Jun 20)
- Re: Equifax Canada Paul D. Robertson (Jun 20)
- Re: Equifax Canada R. DuFresne (Jun 20)
- Re: Equifax Canada Paul D. Robertson (Jun 20)
- Re: Equifax Canada Mark Teicher (Jun 22)
- RE: Equifax Canada Brian Loe (Jun 22)
- Re: Equifax Canada Adrian Grigorof (Jun 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Equifax Canada Monkman, Brian (Jun 20)
- RE: Equifax Canada Paul D. Robertson (Jun 20)
- Re: Equifax Canada Keith A. Glass (Jun 20)
- RE: Equifax Canada Ames, Neil (Jun 29)
- RE: Equifax Canada J. Oquendo (Jun 29)
