Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...)
From: Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:02:30 +0000
In the financial services biz, there's a nice way to get out of this bind: engage the risk analysis team. They hold the reins, nobody is allowed to ignore them, and their job is analyzing risk tradeoffs. Get them involved, teach them enough so they can make informed judgements about computer security risk/cost tradeoffs, and things get better. Not instantly, of course, but the the direction of change switches:-). In other business segments, I think the root problem --- not just for computer security, but for any number of other corporate ills --- is a failure to realistically account for risk in management accounting. The banking and investment folks have a leg up here since their product is buying and selling risk. -Bennett
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right? Mark Tinberg (Jun 01)
- RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right? Tina Bird (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right? Bill McGee (bam) (Jun 01)
- Message not available
- Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Marcus J. Ranum (Jun 02)
- Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Bennett Todd (Jun 02)
- Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Scott Stursa (Jun 02)
- Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Chris Blask (Jun 04)
- RE: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Brian Loe (Jun 10)
- Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) R. DuFresne (Jun 10)
- Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Marcus J. Ranum (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Dave Piscitello (Jun 02)
- Re: Going meta (was RE: Ok, so now we have a firewall...) Marcus J. Ranum (Jun 02)
