Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: so much for "deny all"
From: Adam Jones <ajones1 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:50:51 -0500
Just because they sell it does not mean you have to buy it. You can still do deny all to your heart's content and let the people who need (or think they need) the big expensive smarter-than-me firewall buy that. On 6/7/05, Tina Bird <tbird () precision-guesswork com> wrote:
From the TechTarget coverage of the Gartner Security Summit this week: "Next generation firewalls that do deep-packet inspections from vendors like Juniper Networks, Check Point and Fortinet employ a heuristics engine and allow all network traffic and behavior, except those which policy says it must block. Most enterprises, however, refresh their firewall purchases on a three- to five-year cycle and that makes it challenging to synch new features." *sigh* <http://searchwindowssecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid45_ gci1095755,00.html?track=NL-122&ad=518233> (site requires free registration) _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- so much for "deny all" Tina Bird (Jun 10)
- Re: so much for "deny all" Dave Piscitello (Jun 13)
- RE: so much for "deny all" Tina Bird (Jun 15)
- RE: so much for "deny all" Dave Piscitello (Jun 15)
- RE: so much for "deny all" Tina Bird (Jun 15)
- Re: so much for "deny all" Adam Jones (Jun 13)
- RE: so much for "deny all" Paul Melson (Jun 16)
- RE: so much for "deny all" Kerry Thompson (Jun 17)
- RE: so much for "deny all" Paul Melson (Jun 16)
- Re: so much for "deny all" Rob Hughes (Jun 15)
- Re: so much for "deny all" Dave Piscitello (Jun 13)
