Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: X server in a Firewall
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:45:18 +0300
well, say, yet another a*hole^Wperson walks in and says they deploy a new application, maybe it is not so bad per se so it should not be banned, but changing firewall rulesets to make it pass and blocking everything else that may sneak along may take some time requiring excessive ruleset changes (hey guys, does your sh*t still work when i block THIS?) On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:23:41PM -0500, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
Paul D. Robertson wrote:Indeed, that's why console-only access is the best method.Indeed; if your firewall rulesets change so often that you find it onerous to walk down the hall to the console, then your firewall ruleset is changing too often, which probably means you are already in a state of screwed. mjr. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: X server in a Firewall, (continued)
- Re: X server in a Firewall John M (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Peter Bruderer (Jan 25)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Cat Okita (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Paul D. Robertson (Jan 24)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Cat Okita (Jan 24)
- RE: X server in a Firewall Ben Nagy (Jan 24)
- RE: X server in a Firewall Cat Okita (Jan 25)
- Re: X server in a Firewall Carson Gaspar (Jan 25)
- Re: X server in a Firewall ArkanoiD (Jan 25)
