Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum


From: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul () compuwar net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:23:12 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Paul Melson wrote:

A recent real-life example is our guest network.  To accommodate visiting
contractors, auditors, etc. without just letting them plug into the internal
network, we have a WEP-enabled wireless network that they can use.  This
network only allows access to a handful of ports and protocols, essentially
enough for basic web browsing (80/443), VPN (PPTP and IPSec), and DNS (they
get a DHCP lease that gives them a DNS server address outside of our
network).  That's moderately restrictive, but we still regularly detect
peer-to-peer and IM traffic coming from that subnet.  And that's the

Peer-to-peer and IM are about controlling what someone does, not 
really security.  Both of those are controllable by local machine policy, 
especially in the Windows case- so an IDS is a pretty expensive thing to 
manage just so your visitors don't do something you don't want them to 
do- and QoS would be about as effective in the P2P space.

unencrypted stuff.  Many of these apps will work over ports reserved for
other common protocols or in the case of at least two IM clients, they will
work over HTTP and even through our proxies via GET/POST/POLL methods
(blocking CONNECT is no longer enough).

Yep, but I can certianly block the servers those clients connect to at my 
gateway.  I can tunnel everything over DNS too- that doesn't work in a 
proxy environment.

The moral of the story is that if you don't force all traffic through an
application proxy, you can stand to implement an IDS.  Even still, you
probably have traffic passing through your proxy that you think you're
stopping.

Actually, I think the moral of the story is it's still good to use a 
proxy...

Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
paul () compuwar net       which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
http://fora.compuwar.net      Infosec discussion boards 

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


Current thread: